On the surface, it’s completely sexist towards women. But what’s it covering up? That
men are incapable of controlling their own actions, and are no more
intelligent, or able to make rational decisions than animals. Huh.
Let’s move on to that Kraft ad, and how it’s so controversial. If you aren’t familiar with it, Kraft has an ad that pictures a man naked except for a piece of a tablecloth covering his genitals. And people are up in arms about how risque it is. It’s weird, because media has been using naked women with only their nipples and parts of their genitals covered with their hands or a tiny piece of fabric to sell products for decades. Has there ever been a big fuss about that? Not really.
On the surface, completely sexist towards women. But what’s the deeper truth behind the controversy? That people as a whole are so disgusted with naked men that they can’t bear to see them shown on television commercials. That a naked man is a danger and threat to their children and home, but naked women are exempt. Further than that, men in Speedos are generally “gross", but women in bikinis are celebrated. Women’s breasts are shown in PG-13 movies, but male nudity is always NC-17.
And lastly, the concept of virginity in cultures where virginity is a key factor in whether or not a woman is considered “marriageable". If a woman is a virgin, she’s good. But if a woman has been touched by another man, she is considered “tainted" and not fit for marriage. Why is she tainted? Because something dirty touched her. I mean come on.
I think guys are great. I’m engaged to a great one. And anything in culture that even hints at the fact that his gender is incapable of making decisions above that of an animal’s, disgusting, or shameful really upsets me. Girls, it should upset you too. And men, it should really upset you. You’re not even being openly discriminated against, it’s all underneath the surface.
Let’s move on to that Kraft ad, and how it’s so controversial. If you aren’t familiar with it, Kraft has an ad that pictures a man naked except for a piece of a tablecloth covering his genitals. And people are up in arms about how risque it is. It’s weird, because media has been using naked women with only their nipples and parts of their genitals covered with their hands or a tiny piece of fabric to sell products for decades. Has there ever been a big fuss about that? Not really.
On the surface, completely sexist towards women. But what’s the deeper truth behind the controversy? That people as a whole are so disgusted with naked men that they can’t bear to see them shown on television commercials. That a naked man is a danger and threat to their children and home, but naked women are exempt. Further than that, men in Speedos are generally “gross", but women in bikinis are celebrated. Women’s breasts are shown in PG-13 movies, but male nudity is always NC-17.
And lastly, the concept of virginity in cultures where virginity is a key factor in whether or not a woman is considered “marriageable". If a woman is a virgin, she’s good. But if a woman has been touched by another man, she is considered “tainted" and not fit for marriage. Why is she tainted? Because something dirty touched her. I mean come on.
I think guys are great. I’m engaged to a great one. And anything in culture that even hints at the fact that his gender is incapable of making decisions above that of an animal’s, disgusting, or shameful really upsets me. Girls, it should upset you too. And men, it should really upset you. You’re not even being openly discriminated against, it’s all underneath the surface.